
As I watch the situation unfold in Los Angeles, Ca, I am increasingly convinced the 2028 Summer Olympics should be moved to another city in the United States. The current challenges facing the city are too great, and the risks too high, to justify it being the host for such a prestigious global event.
The ongoing wildfires in California, which especially affect Los Angeles itself, are a significant concern. These fires are becoming more destructive each year, and the city’s response to such natural disasters remains inadequate. With wildfires threatening both the environment and public safety, how can citizens expect Los Angeles to protect the thousands of visitors who would gather for the Olympics? Basic infrastructure, like water in fire hydrants, is already under strain. Entrusting the city with such an important event while these conditions persist is not just risky but downright irresponsible.
Los Angeles’ financial situation poses yet another problem. Rebuilding after repeated natural disasters has placed an enormous strain on the city’s budget, and addressing these ongoing needs will likely divert funds from Olympic preparations. How can we expect secure transportation and reliable facilities when the city’s resources are already stretched thin?
The lack of competent leadership further worsens these challenges. The city is currently facing a leadership issue, with a mayor unable to provide a clear vision or decisive action to address the city’s mounting problems. The lack of accountability and planning raises serious doubts about whether Los Angeles can meet the demands of hosting the Olympics.
In light of these issues, it’s clear that Los Angeles is not equipped to host the 2028 Olympics. A city already grappling with natural disasters, financial instability and ineffective leadership is unlikely to successfully manage the complexities of the world’s largest sporting event. This is not only a disservice to the athletes and the global community, but also to the people of Los Angeles.
Instead, the 2028 Olympics would be better suited for a city in Texas. Texas boasts a combination of stable infrastructure, strong economic health and a track record of hosting major events without the extreme environmental and political challenges Los Angeles currently faces. Cities like Dallas, Houston or Austin have the capacity to host the games, with modern venues, reliable transportation systems and solid governance in place. With less risk of natural disasters and a more predictable climate, Texas presents a far safer and more viable option for hosting the Olympics.